Affiliate Fortune Cookies Episode 14: Affiliates For Sale

by Shawn Collins on January 22, 2008

davidlewis.jpgEpisode 14: Horrendous White House Email Policy, Privacy, UK Affiliates, Affiliate Summit Promotions





Show Notes

- White House Email: Washington Post
- Cory Doctorow on Privacy: Guardian.co.uk
- Affiliate Market Evolving: AMWSO
- UK Aff Market Grows to over 3 Billion: 5 Star Affiliate Programs Blog
- Blue Man Group / PartnerFusion Race: AffiliateTip
- Affiliates for Sale: Jangro

Music by Kingdom Hearts

Subscribe via iTunes

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Shawn Collins January 23, 2008 at 11:42 am

Hey Sam -

I agree that the White House email thing is problematic, but I don’t think it is so surprising that they scrapped the system from the Clinton administration.

Are you using many versions of software from 2000 or before?

Reply

Sam Harrelson January 23, 2008 at 11:44 am

Good point, Shawn… but at least having an antiquated system would be better than nothing (and much better than just copying over data that will… well, would have… prove(d) incredibly valuable for later historians who try to piece together this period in world history.

Reply

Shawn Collins January 23, 2008 at 11:53 am

Do you think historians would/should have access to these communications, anyway?

I think they should have been preserved for the eyes that have clearance.

I can’t imagine how the federal government would treat a public corporation that failed to maintain required records.

Reply

Sam Harrelson January 23, 2008 at 11:57 am

“Do you think historians would/should have access to these communications, anyway?”

UHHH… YEAH.

Email is the notebook of our generation. Imagine not having John Adam’s correspondence or the Federalist Papers (basically letters) to help reconstruct how we arrived at our Constitution??

Or not having Lincoln’s or Jefferson Davis’ notebooks from 1861 to help reconstruct and understand the motives behind the Civil War?

Sure, email is less “permanent” than paper in our mind, but we’re creating a huge information gap for future historians if we don’t treat it with some notion of posterity (especially the emails pertaining to national interests during a period of world history so crucial as our own times).

Reply

Shawn Collins January 23, 2008 at 11:59 am

Seriously, do you think we’ve seen everything from the past?

We know what we have seen, but we don’t know what we haven’t seen. ;-)

Reply

Sam Harrelson January 23, 2008 at 12:01 pm

Haha… so burn it all and make it just as tough for future historians to figure out what the hell we were doing or thinking when we decided this/that because we’ve had a tough time reconstructing the past?

I hope our current culture would leave the world a better place than it is now, and part of that means preserving important information (and important is relevant) about who we were, what we did, why we did it and what it meant for us… White House email certainly falls into that category.

Reply

Shawn Collins January 23, 2008 at 12:21 pm

I’m not saying that at all – just being realistic.

I think there will always be matter that we won’t be privy to from the government – perhaps communications that would fracture strategic relationships.

Anyhow, if I was the next President, I’d be pretty pissed that this necessary narrative of the administration was missing.

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous post:

Next post: